The collapse of the now-bankrupt cryptocurrency trade FTX has put the Singapore prime minister and the ruling authorities in a sizzling seat. Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and Deputy Prime Minister Lawrence Wong are set to face grilling questions for his or her failure to guard retail buyers.
The Members of Parliament (MP) from the opposition Employees’ get together raised 15 questions on Temasek’s funding and FTX collapse. The MPs questioned the federal government’s credibility in monitoring the extent of investments by Temasek and Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund GIC.
The discussions across the authorities insurance policies whereas investing in digital belongings can be scrutinized additional in a parliamentary dialogue on Nov. 28, reported a Singaporean every day. The opposition MPs have beneficial a bipartisan committee to query Temasek on its funding methods and threat administration approaches.
Singaporean state-backed investor Temasek was one in every of 69 buyers to put money into the FTX crypto exchange’s $420 million funding round in October 2021. The agency had invested $210 million within the international trade for a minority stake of 1% and one other $65 million in its sister firm FTX.US. Nonetheless, the state-backed investor wrote down its total $275 million funding within the crypto trade “regardless of the result of FTX’s chapter safety submitting.”
Associated: The FTX contagion: Which companies were affected by the FTX collapse?
Temasek additionally revealed that regardless of eight months of due diligence in 2021, it didn’t find any significant red flags in FTXs financials earlier than deciding to speculate $275 million into the now-failed cryptocurrency trade. Other than Temasek, Sequoia Capital additionally marked down its entire $214 million investment within the crypto trade.
The impression of the FTX collapse has been far-reaching and the worst hit has been tens of millions of retail buyers whose funds have been misappropriated and utilized by the crypto trade to mitigate its personal threat. The collapse has additionally led to wider regulatory dialogue and demand for better regulatory oversight of those centralized entities.
