On June 30, 2022, the U.S. Division of Justice (DOJ) introduced felony expenses in opposition to six defendants in 4 separate felony instances involving alleged fraud within the providing of cryptocurrency funding autos. The DOJ press launch introduced expenses in 4 separate and apparently unrelated instances, filed in two completely different districts: the Southern District of Florida (Miami) and the Central District of California (Los Angeles).1
DOJ’s determination to file expenses near-simultaneously in 4 completely different instances and to subject a single omnibus press launch seems calculated to sign its seriousness in cracking down on cryptocurrency fraud schemes nationwide. In October 2021, DOJ introduced the creation of a Nationwide Cryptocurrency Enforcement Staff (NCET) to deal with advanced investigations and prosecutions of felony misuses of cryptocurrency, notably crimes dedicated by digital forex exchanges, mixing and tumbling providers, and cash laundering infrastructure actors worldwide.
DOJ’s June 30 press launch makes no point out of NCET’s involvement in any of charged instances. However on condition that constructing a felony case, particularly a posh monetary case, can take many months, we might not but have seen the complete scope of enforcement that can emerge because of the NCET’s effort.
A number of of the newly filed instances have a cross-border element given cryptocurrency’s oft-touted potential to boost the effectivity of cross-border monetary transactions. For instance, an affiliate of one of many funding corporations that allegedly supplied fraudulent non-fungible tokens was situated in Mexico and was accused, as an unindicted co-conspirator, of laundering the felony proceeds of the scheme.2
In one other case, two Brazilian nationals and a U.S. nationwide had been charged in Miami for allegedly perpetrating a world cryptocurrency-based Ponzi scheme that generated roughly $100 million from buyers. Amongst different issues, the federal government alleges that the defendants falsely represented to buyers that they’d a proprietary buying and selling bot that might generate outsized returns and so they carried out fictitious demonstrations purporting to indicate the bot executing trades. Along with wire fraud expenses, the defendants had been additionally charged with securities fraud primarily based on DOJ’s allegation that the buying and selling bot certified as a safety beneath federal regulation. Separate civil complaints had been additionally filed by the U.S. Securities and Change Fee (SEC) and the U.S. Commodities Futures Change Fee (CFTC), which alleged that two of the defendants have fled to Brazil.3
With the NCET now supplementing the prevailing DOJ assets liable for these issues, we might count on to see extra cryptocurrency fraud and cash laundering enforcement actions within the close to time period.
2 United States v. Le Ahn Tuan (C.D. Cal. 2:22-cr-273).
3 United States v. Emerson Pires et al. (S.D. Fla. 2:22-cr-20296).
©2022 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved. Nationwide Regulation Assessment, Quantity XII, Quantity 192