[ad_1]
Earlier than they promote out: Get tickets to NY Hashish Insider’s convention on Nov. 4 in Tarrytown, that includes a slew of knowledgeable panelists, free enterprise consultations {and professional} headshots, networking, lunch and a cheerful hour.
MedMen is arguing in federal courtroom that its landlord can’t maintain the multistate hashish operator liable for paying about $1 million in back-rent as a result of marijuana is federally unlawful – an odd argument that consultants say may discourage New York landlords from renting area to weed companies.
“There’s completely consideration and concern about what this implies for present landlord-tenant relationships and sooner or later, particularly in New York,” stated Kristin Jordan, founder and CEO of Park Jordan, a cannabis-focused actual property brokerage and advisory providers agency.
“My concern is that the longer this drags on, the extra consideration that it will get, the extra concern and concern that may ripple via the business,” Jordan stated.
MedMen’s legal professionals made the argument final week in a swimsuit that actual property agency Thor Equities filed in opposition to the corporate for allegedly breaking a 2019 lease, Law360 reported.
Thor claims Medmen stopped paying lease for a location in Chicago in August of 2021 and owes greater than $950,000.
MedMen doesn’t dispute that it signed a lease with Thor after which stopped paying lease. However, they are saying, federal regulation doesn’t afford Thor any enforcement of that lease.
“As Plaintiff effectively is aware of, nonetheless, it’s not entitled to judicial enforcement of the Lease and the Guaranties or the damages it seeks as a result of the distribution and sale of marijuana and the lease of actual property for such functions continues to be unlawful beneath Federal regulation,” the movement reads.
Jordan, who can be an legal professional, stated she finds MedMen’s authorized argument “absurd,” however added that courtroom instances can yield sudden outcomes.
The uncertainty surrounding this case may actually put a damper on actual property alternatives for weed firms in authorized states, particularly in New York and different East Coast states that not too long ago legalized, Jordan stated, and discovering viable actual property was already one of the crucial tough points of beginning a weed firm within the Empire State.
Landlords “will not be going to be as motivated to work with one thing that they don’t perceive that’s nonetheless federally unlawful,” Jordan stated. “Not absolutely understanding what the result of this lawsuit is makes it all of the tougher, as a result of we will’t present assurance” to landlords, she stated.
Colby Piper, director of hashish actual property at RIPCO, agreed that the lawsuit may persuade some landlords who had been on the fence about renting to a weed firm to keep away from the hashish business. However he doesn’t suppose weed firms searching for actual property in New York will discover a lot of a distinction in what’s obtainable.
“Truthfully, I feel it’s the stupidest protection ever; as a result of in the end what they’re doing is looking the police on themselves,” Piper stated. “If the owner can’t gather cash, how will you gather cash for a federally unlawful product?”
[ad_2]
Source link